2011 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 119, Intellectual Property Court


Source:Wideband Patent Success Case
2016/01/10
 

[Success Case]
Case No. 2011 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 119, Intellectual Property Court
 
[Decision Digest]
The problem(s) to be solved and technical effect produced in exhibit 1 are the opposite of the patent at issue. Therefore, based on the technical content disclosed in exhibit 1 and considering the common knowledge at the time of patent filing, those with common knowledge still cannot easily accomplish the invention in claim 1 of the patent at issue.


Related articles
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.
Author of the article
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.

 
AboutArticlesServiceContactDisclaimer
© Wideband IP Office 廣流智權事務所