2012 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 106, Intellectual Property Court


Source:Wideband Patent Success Case
2016/01/11
 

[Success Case]
Case No. 2012 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 106, Intellectual Property Court
 
[Decision Digest]
The original administrative disposition determines that exhibit 2 is not the prior art of the patent at issue, that is, no cross examination was made with the combination of exhibits 2 and 3 and exhibits 2 and 4 (i.e. exhibits 3 and 4 were not considered). In addition, as new evidence, exhibits 5 and 6, was also not considered, the decision to overrule the application for patent invalidation is unreasonable, and the appeal decision to maintain the prior disposition is also inappropriate.
(Collected by TIPO as a representative case in Compilation of Patent Administrative Proceeding Cases 2012-2013)


Related articles
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.
Author of the article
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.

 
AboutArticlesServiceContactDisclaimer
© Wideband IP Office 廣流智權事務所