2014 Pan-Zi 417, Supreme Administrative Court


Source:Wideband Patent Success Case
2016/01/13
 

[Success Case]
Case No. 2014 Pan-Zi 417, Supreme Administrative Court
 
[Decision Digest]
Reference can be made to extrinsic evidence where intrinsic evidence is insufficient. As mentioned in the statement of the preparation procedure for the previous proceeding, convictions of the patent at issue are also found in relevant prior cases. In addition, the inventor of this case can provide relevant inventions for reference. To clarify the scope of protection of the patent at issue, the said evidence should be carefully considered when interpreting the claims of the patent at issue.


Related articles
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.
Author of the article
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.

 
AboutArticlesServiceContactDisclaimer
© Wideband IP Office 廣流智權事務所