2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.


Source:Wideband Patent Success Case
2016/01/13
 

[Success Case]
Case No. 2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.
[Decision Digest]
Claims 1 to 8 and 10 to 15 of the patent at issue lack non-obviousness, which constitutes the reason for invalidation. According to paragraph 2 of Article 16, Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act, the plaintiff shall not claim any rights from the defendant.


Related articles
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.
Author of the article
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.

 
AboutArticlesServiceContactDisclaimer
© Wideband IP Office 廣流智權事務所