2013 Min-Zhuan-Shang-Zi 71, Intellectual Property Court


Source:Wideband Patent Success Case
2016/01/12
 

[Success Case]
Case No. 2013 Min-Zhuan-Shang-Zi 71, Intellectual Property Court
[Decision Digest]
The product at issue does not fall within claim 1 of the patent at issue, and exhibit 1, exhibit 3, the combination of exhibits 1 and 4, and exhibits 1 and 3 can prove that claim 1 of the patent at issue lacks non-obviousness.


Related articles
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.
Author of the article
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.

 
AboutArticlesServiceContactDisclaimer
© Wideband IP Office 廣流智權事務所