2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380


Source:Wideband Patent Success Case
2016/01/13
 

[Success Case]
Case No. 2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
[Decision Digest]
Before determining that this case is not patentable, the original disposing authority did not notify the appellant of the said new reason and give it an opportunity to substantially express its opinion or give supplements or make corrections for the case. This does not comply with the intent of paragraph 2 of Article 46 of the Patent Act.
(Collected by TIPO as a representative case in Compilation of Patent Administrative Proceeding Cases 2011-2012)    


Related articles
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.
Author of the article
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.

 
AboutArticlesServiceContactDisclaimer
© Wideband IP Office 廣流智權事務所