2008 Su-Zi 394, Taipei High Administrative Court


Source:Wideband Patent Success Case
2016/01/07
 

[Success Case]
Case No. 2008 Su-Zi 394, Taipei High Administrative Court
 
[Decision Digest]
The combination of exhibits 2 and 3 cannot constitute the structure in claim1 of the patent at issue. In addition, compared the patent at issue with the exhibits, the overall structure is simple, assembly is easy, maintenance and repair are quick, the performance is thus improved to demonstrate non-obviousness.


Related articles
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.
Author of the article
2015 Jing-Su-Zi 10406302040
2015 Xing-Zhuan-Su-Zi 27, Intellectual Property Court
2014 Jing-Su-Zi 10306108380
2014 Min-Zhuan-Su-Zi 40, Intellectual Property Court.

 
AboutArticlesServiceContactDisclaimer
© Wideband IP Office 廣流智權事務所