[Success Case]
Case No. 2012 Jing-Su-Zi 10106101750 [Decision Digest]
Before determining that this case is not patentable, the original disposing authority did not notify the appellant of the said new reason and give it an opportunity to substantially express its opinion or give supplements or make corrections for the case. This does not comply with the intent of paragraph 2 of Article 46 of the Patent Act.
(Collected by TIPO as a representative case in Compilation of Patent Administrative Proceeding Cases 2011-2012)
