   
[Success Case]
Case No. 2015 Pan-Zi 454, Supreme Administrative Court
[Decision Digest]
In addition, the appellant HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG could not prove that such trademark(s) has(have) been used on foods and beverages in business diversification…thus determining that there is no likelihood for consumers to confuse both parties from the trademark. Hence, the applicability of the front part of item 12, paragraph 1, Article 23 of the Trademark Act of 2003 and the front part of item 11, paragraph 1, Article 30 of the current version of the Trademark Act as determined in the previous judgment is against the law.
|
