Case No. Central Taiwan Fei-Zi L01020440


Source:Wideband Trademark Success Case
2016/01/01
 

[Success Case]
Case No. Central Taiwan Fei-Zi L01020440
[Decision Digest]
However, the nature of the “release paper” products distributed by the trademark owner as shown in the photocopy of relevant evidence is inequivalent (detailed below) to that of the products where the trademark at issue is used. The trademark owner also did not provide evidence to prove the use of its trademark on other products. Such photocopy data cannot prove that the trademark owner has used the trademark in dispute on designated products within three years before the petitioner’s petition for patent invalidation.


Related articles
Case No. Central Taiwan Fei-Zi L01030373
Case No. Central Taiwan Fei-Zi L01020440
Case No. Central Taiwan Ping-Zi H01000257
Case No. Central Taiwan Ping-Zi H01000256
Author of the article
Case No. Central Taiwan Fei-Zi L01030373
Case No. Central Taiwan Fei-Zi L01020440
Case No. Central Taiwan Ping-Zi H01000257
Case No. Central Taiwan Ping-Zi H01000256

 
AboutArticlesServiceContactDisclaimer
© Wideband IP Office 廣流智權事務所