Case No. Central Taiwan Yi-Zi G01030018


Source:Wideband Trademark Success Case
2016/01/01
 

[Success Case]
Case No. Central Taiwan Yi-Zi G01030018
[Decision Digest]
Given that the trademarks of both parties are only similar at a medium grade, each trademark has own distinctive characters, and the claiming trademark is only used by its owner in the leisure and tourism services of its ranch. Compared to the designated use of the trademark at issue: goods transportation, goods warehousing, warehouse rental, warehousing and custody information, goods packaging, product packaging, gift packaging, commodity express delivery, goods delivery, logistics and transportation, fresh flower delivery, mail order delivery, provision of transportation information, computer tracking of goods delivery, and provision of non-downloadable e-map services over telecommunication networks; both the nature of business and target customer groups of both parties are completely different and with clear market segmentation.


Related articles
Case No. Central Taiwan Fei-Zi L01030373
Case No. Central Taiwan Fei-Zi L01020440
Case No. Central Taiwan Ping-Zi H01000257
Case No. Central Taiwan Ping-Zi H01000256
Author of the article
Case No. Central Taiwan Fei-Zi L01030373
Case No. Central Taiwan Fei-Zi L01020440
Case No. Central Taiwan Ping-Zi H01000257
Case No. Central Taiwan Ping-Zi H01000256

 
AboutArticlesServiceContactDisclaimer
© Wideband IP Office 廣流智權事務所